Skip to main content

Property Stories: How Torrens Title Failed to Solve All the Problems ...

Image
By
This is a reminder that Paul Babie, Professor and Associate Dean, Adelaide Law School, Australia and John Orth of UNC's law school will be presenting a lunchtime program on the Torrens system on November 7 at UNC Law's faculty lounge.  The program, entitled "Property Stories: How Torrens Title Failed to Solve All the Problems, and Actually Created Some," is as follows:

 The Prisoners of Adams Creek: Family, Race, Adverse Possession, and Torrens Title in North Carolina – John Orth

Beginning in 2002, litigation in Carteret County that began as a family quarrel has sent North Carolina lawyers scrambling to understand Torrens Title, has raised uncomfortable questions about the collision between race and the Progressive attempt to simplify land titles, and has led to the years-long imprisonment of two African-American men for contempt.  Adams Creek Assocs. v. Davis, 746 S.E.2d 1 (N.C. Ct. App.), disc. rev. denied, 748 S.E.2d 322 (N.C. 2013); Buck v. Davis, 772 S.E.2d 707 (N.C. 2015) (denying writ of habeas corpus).

The Carey Gulley Squatter: Crown and Possessory Title of Torrens Land in South Australia – Paul Babie

Recent events in South Australia surrounding an alleged ‘squatter’ on Torrens land emphasise the ongoing importance of some fundamental principles of English land law in Australia: the Crown’s interest in all Australian land, be it known either as escheat or bona vacantia, and the related concepts of possession and adverse possession of land.  Seldom seen and therefore little understood, each of these principles continues to operate in respect of Torrens land.

After a brief introduction in Part I of this article, Part II recounts the intriguing events surrounding the alleged ‘Carey Gulley Squatter’ in the Adelaide Hills of South Australia.  Using those events as a factual matrix, Part III explores the operation of escheat/bona vacantia in relation to Torrens land.  Part IV considers possessory title to Torrens land, with particular focus on the nature of that right both before title by adverse possession might be recognized (‘inchoate possessory title’), and after (‘possessory title’), and the caveatability of either form of title.  In both cases, I consider the position if a private individual is the registered proprietor and if the Crown is the holder.

 Please let Al Brophy know if you'd like a copy of the paper (abrophy@email.unc.edu)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mandy Cooper at TLHS, Friday, April 21

By
The next meeting of the Triangle Legal History Seminar will be this Friday, April 21, at the National Humanities Center from 4-6 pm.  Our presenter will be Mandy Cooper, PhD Candidate in History at Duke University. Her paper is entitled "The Family State: Family Credit and the Public Good in the Antebellum U.S.": What you'll be reading is the fourth chapter of my dissertation. My dissertation as a whole uses emotions as a lens to examine the economic and political work done by elite families in building the U.S. in the decades between the Revolution and the Civil War. I focus on two large family networks - the Coles and the Camerons - which were centered in the South, spread across the U.S., and extended across the Atlantic. My introduction will have the main historiographical points as well as introduce the different individuals in these large families. Since there won't be much background on many of the individuals in this chapter, I've included the attached...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kathryn T. Preyer Scholars: Call for Papers, 2017

By
Named after the late Kathryn T. Preyer, a distinguished historian of the law of early America known for her generosity to young legal historians, the program of Kathryn T. Preyer Scholars is designed to help legal historians at the beginning of their careers. At the annual meeting of the Society two early career legal historians designated Kathryn T. Preyer Scholars will present what would normally be their first papers to the Society. The generosity of Professor Preyer’s friends and family has enabled the Society to offer a small honorarium to the Preyer Scholars and to reimburse, in some measure or entirely, their costs of attending the meeting. The competition for Preyer Scholars is organized by the Society’s Kathryn T. Preyer Memorial Committee. Submissions are welcome on any topic in legal, institutional and/or constitutional history.  Early career scholars, including those pursuing graduate or law degrees, those who have completed their terminal degree within the previou...
Post a Comment
Read more

TLHS on Hiatus 2017-2018

By
The Triangle Legal History Seminar will not convene for the 2017-2018 academic year, in part due to changes in leadership and departures by longtime organizers.  While this is unfortunate, the timing coincides with a one-year seminar on corporations and international law at Duke University.  Those in the Triangle area seeking legal-historical events should check out this seminar while awaiting the return of TLHS in fall 2018.
Post a Comment
Read more